[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2285353.hkbZ0PkbqX@timur-hyperion>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 13:06:30 +0100
From: Timur Kristóf <timur.kristof@...il.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
Hamza Mahfooz <someguy@...ective-light.com>,
Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@...lbox.org>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>, Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
Rodrigo Siqueira <siqueira@...lia.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@....com>, Ce Sun <cesun102@....com>,
Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@....com>, Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@....com>,
Ivan Lipski <ivan.lipski@....com>, Alex Hung <alex.hung@....com>,
Tom Chung <chiahsuan.chung@....com>, Melissa Wen <mwen@...lia.com>,
Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@....com>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: introduce page_flip_timeout()
On Thursday, January 29, 2026 12:38:30 PM Central European Standard Time
Christian König wrote:
> >
> > However, just like we do with ring timeouts, we also need to be prepared
> > for the situation where a page flip timeout happens and we should try to
> > recover from it. And if it isn't recoverable, fall back to GPU reset.
>
> No, that is clearly a bad idea.
I don't see why it's "clearly" a bad idea. It's not clear to me at all, please
clarify it for me.
> CRTCs are fixed function devices that GPU
> reset helps here is just pure coincident.
Currently, the driver doesn't handle page flip timeouts at all, which means
that if it happens, there is 0% chance of recovering from it.
If the GPU reset improves that chance to non-zero, it's already an
improvement, and already more than what AMD did to address this problem for
the past few years. I just find it incredibly disrespectful towards the
community that AMD proposes a solution that they neglect to implement, then
when somebody from the community steps up to implement it, it's rejected.
> What we can certainly do is to improve the error handling, e.g. that the
> system doesn't sit there forever after a page flip timeout.
Sure.
>
> Let's maybe try a complete different approach. We force a page flip timeout,
> and see if the system can handle that or not.
>
> E.g. every 300 page flip we just fail to signal and see if things still work
> after the timeout.
How do you propose to do that?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists