[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <176978613592.3951544.9728416314683408699.b4-ty@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 07:15:35 -0800
From: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>
To: Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>, Ziyi Guo <n7l8m4@...orthwestern.edu>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wifi: ath10k: fix lock protection in
ath10k_wmi_event_peer_sta_ps_state_chg()
On Fri, 23 Jan 2026 17:56:11 +0000, Ziyi Guo wrote:
> ath10k_wmi_event_peer_sta_ps_state_chg() uses lockdep_assert_held() to
> assert that ar->data_lock should be held by the caller, but neither
> ath10k_wmi_10_2_op_rx() nor ath10k_wmi_10_4_op_rx() acquire this lock
> before calling this function.
>
> The field arsta->peer_ps_state is documented as protected by
> ar->data_lock in core.h, and other accessors (ath10k_peer_ps_state_disable,
> ath10k_dbg_sta_read_peer_ps_state) properly acquire this lock.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] wifi: ath10k: fix lock protection in ath10k_wmi_event_peer_sta_ps_state_chg()
commit: 820ba7dd6859ef8b1eaf6014897e7aa4756fc65d
Best regards,
--
Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@....qualcomm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists