linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] thermal: Add Remote Proc cooling driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <07f0515a-8c1a-456a-aaa8-1533717573ab@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 12:12:35 +0530
From: Gaurav Kohli <gaurav.kohli@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
        krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
        lukasz.luba@....com, konradybcio@...nel.org, mani@...nel.org,
        casey.connolly@...aro.org, amit.kucheria@....qualcomm.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        manaf.pallikunhi@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] thermal: Add Remote Proc cooling driver


On 1/28/2026 5:06 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 09:27:15PM +0530, Gaurav Kohli wrote:
>> +	if (!name || !ops)
>> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> +
>> +	rproc_cdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*rproc_cdev), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!rproc_cdev)
>> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> +	rproc_cdev->ops = ops;
>> +	rproc_cdev->devdata = devdata;
>> +	mutex_init(&rproc_cdev->lock);
>> +
>> +	char *rproc_name __free(kfree) =
>> +		kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, REMOTEPROC_PREFIX "%s", name);
> Ah, you keep ignoring review and sending the same buggy code.
>
> There is no point to spend any time here. It's also fastest way to get
> your future contributions ignored or NAKed.


Apologies for the miss, will make sure not to miss this in future version.


>
> Well, ignoring review is obviously:
> NAK
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>