[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875x8jmsa8.ffs@tglx>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 09:14:07 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>
To: Tianyang Zhang <zhangtianyang@...ngson.cn>, chenhuacai@...nel.org,
kernel@...0n.name, corbet@....net, alexs@...nel.org, si.yanteng@...ux.dev,
jiaxun.yang@...goat.com, maobibo@...ngson.cn
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tianyang Zhang <zhangtianyang@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/4] irqchip/irq-loongson.h:irq-loongson.h
preparation for Redirect irqchip
On Fri, Jan 30 2026 at 10:59, Tianyang Zhang wrote:
The subject line is broken and incomprehensible. Something like:
irqchip/irq-loonarch-avec: Prepare for interrupt redirection support
is concise and gives context.
> Adjusted definitions and macro from loongson-avec.c to irq-loongson.h,
> including:
> 1 marco AVEC_MSG_OFFSET
> 2 struct avecintc_data
> 3 Make avecintc_sync public
That's not a change log because it only tells _what_ the patch is doing,
but not _why_. Enumerating the details of what is moved is a pointless
exercise because that can bee seen from the diff itself.
So you want something like:
Interrupt redirection support requires a new interrupt chip, which
needs to share data structures, constants and functions with the AVEC
code.
Move them to the header file and make the required functions public.
See?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists