[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aXymzRDYGatRUcp0@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 13:40:45 +0100
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, kernel@...0n.name,
jiaxun.yang@...goat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, arnd@...db.de,
x86@...nel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, vulab@...as.ac.cn,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org, dakr@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] MIPS: Loongson: Make cpumask_of_node() robust
against NUMA_NO_NODE
On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 12:21:45PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 25/01/2026 03:55, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > Reviewed-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
>
> Thanks
>
> So can a loongarch or mips maintainer pick this up please?
I'll take MIPS patch.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists