[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260131165040.381d414b@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 16:50:40 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: "Miclaus, Antoniu" <Antoniu.Miclaus@...log.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>, Lars-Peter Clausen
<lars@...afoo.de>, "Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, "Sa, Nuno" <Nuno.Sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Matti Vaittinen
<mazziesaccount@...il.com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...x.de>, Sakari Ailus
<sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad4080: remove unused dec_rate field
On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 07:32:58 +0000
"Miclaus, Antoniu" <Antoniu.Miclaus@...log.com> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
> > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 7:22 AM
> > To: Miclaus, Antoniu <Antoniu.Miclaus@...log.com>
> > Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>; Hennerich, Michael
> > <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>; Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>;
> > David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>; Sa, Nuno <Nuno.Sa@...log.com>;
> > Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>; Matti Vaittinen
> > <mazziesaccount@...il.com>; Fabio Estevam <festevam@...x.de>; Sakari
> > Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>; Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>; linux-
> > iio@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad4080: remove unused dec_rate field
> >
> > [External]
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 07:21:58PM +0200, Antoniu Miclaus wrote:
> > > Remove unused dec_rate field from ad4080_state struct.
> > > The driver reads/writes decimation rate directly from
> > > hardware registers via ad4080_get_dec_rate() and
> > > ad4080_set_dec_rate() functions.
> >
> > It seems you missed my reply to one of your previous series.
> > Do *not* thread emails which are independent!
>
> Hi,
>
> I didn't miss your previous email. I checked now the command used for sending the patches and it didn't include the --thread option
>
> From terminal history:
> `git send-email --to-cmd='./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --norolestats iio-unused/000*' iio-unused/000*`
Experiment a bit. These are threaded with all the later ones in reply to the first patch.
In-Reply-To: <20260129172340.34216-1-antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>
is set in the header.
As I mentioned in other branch of thread. I'd actually prefer sets of patches doing
a similar thing bundled up in a thread with a cover letter and clear patch numbering.
That cover letter can provide some brief background info on the common elements of
the series. Even if it is trivial it puts a sensible grouping on them and reduces
how commands are needed to apply them.
Jonathan
>
> Thanks,
>
> > Really, you should have something internally at the AD to explain the process
> > and the simple things like this.
> >
> > --
> > With Best Regards,
> > Andy Shevchenko
> >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists