linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] perf events fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260201200413.GC2995752@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2026 21:04:13 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf events fix

On Sun, Feb 01, 2026 at 10:26:17AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2026 at 03:31, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > So both this and the sched thing are *really* fresh, I stuck them in
> > late Friday and left you a message that they should probably go in next
> > week.
> 
> So I think I'd rather see them hit rc8 (later today) and have a week
> of testing in my tree and be reverted if they cause problems, than
> have them go in after rc8 and then cause problems in the 6.19 release
> instead..

OK fair enough. Usually I'm fairly hesitant to rush things through
/urgent, but if you don't mind, then I'm certainly not going to object
;-)

Thanks!