[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPVz0n0rG5XDUi-sr75rw_++kBbfyAfpMH0DoONZPmUKHfLfCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 17:03:02 +0200
From: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Dixit Parmar <dixitparmar19@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/10] dt-bindings: input: cpcap-pwrbutton: convert to schema
вт, 3 лют. 2026 р. о 17:01 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> пише:
>
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2026 at 09:07:07AM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > сб, 31 січ. 2026 р. о 22:02 David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> пише:
> > >
> > > On 1/25/26 7:42 AM, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> > > > Convert power button devicetree bindings for the Motorola CPCAP MFD from
> > > > TXT to YAML format. This patch does not change any functionality; the
> > > > bindings remain the same.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../bindings/input/cpcap-pwrbutton.txt | 20 ------------
> > > > .../input/motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton.yaml | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/cpcap-pwrbutton.txt
> > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton.yaml
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/cpcap-pwrbutton.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/cpcap-pwrbutton.txt
> > > > deleted file mode 100644
> > > > index 0dd0076daf71..000000000000
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/cpcap-pwrbutton.txt
> > > > +++ /dev/null
> > > > @@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
> > > > -Motorola CPCAP on key
> > > > -
> > > > -This module is part of the CPCAP. For more details about the whole
> > > > -chip see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/motorola-cpcap.txt.
> > > > -
> > > > -This module provides a simple power button event via an Interrupt.
> > > > -
> > > > -Required properties:
> > > > -- compatible: should be one of the following
> > > > - - "motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton"
> > > > -- interrupts: irq specifier for CPCAP's ON IRQ
> > > > -
> > > > -Example:
> > > > -
> > > > -&cpcap {
> > > > - cpcap_pwrbutton: pwrbutton {
> > > > - compatible = "motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton";
> > > > - interrupts = <23 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
> > > > - };
> > > > -};
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton.yaml
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..643f6b2b1f13
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton.yaml
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > > +---
> > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/input/motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton.yaml#
> > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > > +
> > > > +title: Motorola CPCAP PMIC power key
> > > > +
> > > > +maintainers:
> > > > + - Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@...il.com>
> > > > +
> > > > +description:
> > > > + This module is part of the Motorola CPCAP MFD device. For more details
> > > > + see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/motorola,cpcap.yaml. The
> > > > + power key is represented as a sub-node of the PMIC node on the device
> > > > + tree.
> > > > +
> > > > +properties:
> > > > + compatible:
> > > > + const: motorola,cpcap-pwrbutton
> > > > +
> > > > + interrupts:
> > > > + minItems: 1
> > >
> > > Should this be maxItems: 1?
> > >
> > > > + description: CPCAP's ON interrupt
> > >
> > > Or I suppose:
> > >
> > > items:
> > > - description: ...
> > >
> >
> > Both options are perfectly fine for me, and I lean towards using
> > "items: desc" but I would like to hear what schema maintainers would
> > say, which layout is preferred in this case.
>
> Either is fine. 'description' is fine if you have something specific
> about the interrupt to say. Saying what the interrupt is for is
> specific. So 'description' is good in this case.
>
Noted, thank you.
> Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists