lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260204-credit-precinct-5424c122a79f@spud>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 15:50:02 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
	Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@...ogic.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
	linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] pinctrl: pinconf-generic: move ..dt_node_to_map_pinmux()
 to amlogic-am4 driver

On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 04:26:29PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 04:22:47PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 02:15:10PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 09:05:34AM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 12:34:36AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 5:17 PM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > > Note, please, remove extra '.' (dot) in the Subject.o
> > > 
> > > fwiw, the .. was intentional cos I was truncating the pinconf_generic
> > > from the function since the subject was really long, not referring to
> > > a member of an ops struct.
> > 
> > Yes, and that's how we refer to the callbacks — with a single dot and parentheses:
> > 
> > 	.my_cool_cb()
> > 
> > Alternatively
> > 
> > 	->my_cool_cb()
> > 
> > but it one character longer and TBH it slightly less readable (I personally
> > used the latter and then switched to the former in the recent years).
> 
> Hmm... My memory tricked me, it seems I switched to ->cb() notation, at least
> there are patches with that from October last year. Whatever, choose one and
> use it :-)

I think you missed my point, I was /not/ trying to refer to an ops struct
member. For those I follow the first of the two notations you listed.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ