[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb9c7c2c53d5a4196ceb0ec81dcee747dd7df5e9.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 14:13:17 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@...nel.org>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>, Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@...hat.com>, Dai
Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: report the requested maximum number of threads
instead of number running
On Wed, 2026-02-04 at 13:51 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2026, at 12:23 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > The current netlink and /proc interfaces deviate from their traditional
> > values when dynamic threading is enabled, and there is currently no way
> > to know what the current setting is. This patch brings the reporting
> > back in line with traditional behavior.
> >
> > Make these interfaces report the requested maximum number of threads
> > instead of the number currently running.
> >
> > Fixes: d8316b837c2c ("nfsd: add controls to set the minimum number of
> > threads per pool")
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > I think this is less surprising than the current behavior of what's in
> > Chuck's tree. We could also consider adding netlink attributes to report
> > the number of running threads, but you can get that info from ps too.
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 2 +-
> > fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 7 ++++---
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
> > index
> > 4d8e3c1a7be3b3a4e4f5248b27b60d6b3ae88d51..178c7646b2e25630b85de937d7ced18947c047f9
> > 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c
> > @@ -1700,7 +1700,7 @@ int nfsd_nl_threads_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > struct genl_info *info)
> > struct svc_pool *sp = &nn->nfsd_serv->sv_pools[i];
> >
> > err = nla_put_u32(skb, NFSD_A_SERVER_THREADS,
> > - sp->sp_nrthreads);
> > + sp->sp_nrthrmax);
> > if (err)
> > goto err_unlock;
> > }
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> > index
> > 8184514c58de8e396795cd4714a04d66d9637f17..be0add971c2d994948c3e8fca19bcf6f3c75dfaf
> > 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> > @@ -239,12 +239,13 @@ static void nfsd_net_free(struct percpu_ref *ref)
> >
> > int nfsd_nrthreads(struct net *net)
> > {
> > - int rv = 0;
> > + int i, rv = 0;
> > struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(net, nfsd_net_id);
> >
> > mutex_lock(&nfsd_mutex);
> > if (nn->nfsd_serv)
> > - rv = nn->nfsd_serv->sv_nrthreads;
> > + for (i = 0; i < nn->nfsd_serv->sv_nrpools; ++i)
> > + rv += nn->nfsd_serv->sv_pools[i].sp_nrthrmax;
> > mutex_unlock(&nfsd_mutex);
> > return rv;
> > }
> > @@ -673,7 +674,7 @@ int nfsd_get_nrthreads(int n, int *nthreads, struct
> > net *net)
> >
> > if (serv)
> > for (i = 0; i < serv->sv_nrpools && i < n; i++)
> > - nthreads[i] = serv->sv_pools[i].sp_nrthreads;
> > + nthreads[i] = serv->sv_pools[i].sp_nrthrmax;
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> AI code review observes that:
>
> The documentation should be updated to reflect that these interfaces
> now report the configured maximum threads rather than running threads:
>
> 1. Documentation/netlink/specs/nfsd.yaml line 168 - threads-get is
> documented as "get the number of running threads" but now returns
> the configured maximum
> 2. fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c lines 387-405 - The write_threads() docstring
> says it reports "the number of running NFSD threads" but now
> reports the configured maximum
> 3. fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c lines 1666-1673 - The nfsd_nl_threads_get_doit()
> docstring says "get the number of running threads"
>
Ok, I'll do that for v2.
Thanks,
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists