lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69839b4bdf198_58e21100f@iweiny-mobl.notmuch>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 13:17:31 -0600
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Li Chen <me@...ux.beauty>, "Linux Kernel
 Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
	<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nvdimm tree with the vhost tree

Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the nvdimm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   b381542686726 ("nvdimm: virtio_pmem: serialize flush requests")

Michael,

I assume you will drop the v1?

Ira

> 
> from the vhost tree and commit:
> 
>   c4ae8ec088db0 ("nvdimm: virtio_pmem: serialize flush requests")
> 
> from the nvdimm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> (note that the changes to add out_unlock are dropped)
> 
> diff --cc drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c
> index 827a17fe7c710,af82385be7c6a..0000000000000
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c
> @@@ -44,8 -44,7 +44,8 @@@ static int virtio_pmem_flush(struct nd_
>   	unsigned long flags;
>   	int err, err1;
>   
>  +	might_sleep();
> - 	mutex_lock(&vpmem->flush_lock);
> + 	guard(mutex)(&vpmem->flush_lock);
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Don't bother to submit the request to the device if the device is



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ