[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4504b830225a8fdb7407572d92b65daf390ac8a.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 15:56:54 -0500
From: lyude@...hat.com
To: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Simona
Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Shankari
Anand <shankari.ak0208@...il.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Benno
Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Asahi Lina <lina+kernel@...hilina.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] rust/drm: Don't setup private driver data until
registration
On Wed, 2026-02-04 at 15:28 -0300, Daniel Almeida wrote:
> > + pub(crate) data_is_init: AtomicBool,
>
> What about this?
>
> /**
> * @registered:
> *
> * Internally used by drm_dev_register() and
> drm_connector_register().
> */
> bool registered;
>
> Can’t we use this in lieu of this flag you’ve added?
No we couldn't unfortunately. As I said before: a lot of KMS setup has
to happen prior to registration, and most of those callbacks
(atomic_check, atomic_commit, etc.) can both happen before registration
and after. And that's a lot more difficult to deal with if we don't
have access to the private driver data for any of those callbacks.
So - it really does truly need to be tracked separately.
>
> > +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists