linux-kernel - Re: (subset) [PATCH v4 00/15] spi: cadence-qspi: Add Renesas RZ/N1 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <874invft4e.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 10:16:01 +0100
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,  Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,  Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,  Geert
 Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,  Magnus Damm
 <magnus.damm@...il.com>,  Vaishnav Achath <vaishnav.a@...com>,  Thomas
 Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,  Hervé Codina
 <herve.codina@...tlin.com>,  Wolfram Sang
 <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,  Vignesh Raghavendra
 <vigneshr@...com>,  Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@...com>,  Pratyush Yadav
 <pratyush@...nel.org>,  Pascal Eberhard <pascal.eberhard@...com>,
  linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,  devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,  linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v4 00/15] spi: cadence-qspi: Add Renesas RZ/N1
 support

Hi Mark,

> Applied to
>
>    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
>
> Thanks!

[...]

> [02/15] spi: dt-bindings: cdns,qspi-nor: Add Renesas RZ/N1D400 to the list
>         (no commit info)
> [10/15] spi: cadence-qspi: Kill cqspi_jh7110_clk_init
>         (no commit info)
> [14/15] spi: cadence-qspi: Add support for the Renesas RZ/N1 controller
>         (no commit info)

Git was actually smart enough, it solved the conflicts without asking
during rebase :) Shall I resend these 3 patches (+ the typo reported by
Geert) updated after a spi/for-next rebase or do you prefer to wait for
next -rc1?

Thanks,
Miquèl