linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] dt-bindings: sram: describe the IPQ5424 IMEM as mmio-sram

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260205-classic-cute-panda-a97bad@quoll>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 10:18:07 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, 
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, 
	Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] dt-bindings: sram: describe the IPQ5424 IMEM as
 mmio-sram

On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 04:14:30PM +0530, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
> Based on the discussion in the linux-arm-msm list, it is not
> appropriate to define the IMEM (On-Chip SRAM) as syscon or MFD.

3rd party discussions without any references are not valid reason. You

Best regards,
Krzysztof