[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e9c4610-1329-4e86-ae20-1509e24738b8@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 15:01:18 +0530
From: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck
<linux@...ck-us.net>,
Rajendra Nayak <quic_rjendra@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] dt-bindings: sram: describe the IPQ5424 IMEM as
mmio-sram
On 2/5/2026 2:48 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 04:14:30PM +0530, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
>> Based on the discussion in the linux-arm-msm list, it is not
>> appropriate to define the IMEM (On-Chip SRAM) as syscon or MFD.
> 3rd party discussions without any references are not valid reason. You
Here is the reference -
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/e4c5ecc3-fd97-4b13-a057-bb1a3b7f9207@kernel.org.
Let me include this in next revision.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists