[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxi3bNYq1b4=qL-JLi19hRwurntfLZXhUMVL003NarBdGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 10:45:38 +0100
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netfs@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org,
apparmor@...ts.ubuntu.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] ovl: remove ovl_lock_rename_workdir()
On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 6:09 AM NeilBrown <neilb@...mail.net> wrote:
>
> From: NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>
>
> This function is unused.
>
I am confused.
What was this "fix" fixing an unused function:
e9c70084a64e5 ovl: fail ovl_lock_rename_workdir() if either target is unhashed
What am I missing?
Otherwise, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists