[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260205094226.GF232055@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 10:42:26 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, luto@...nel.org,
paulmck@...nel.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] smp: Remove get_cpu from smp_call_function_any
On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 07:23:53PM +0800, Chuyi Zhou wrote:
> Now smp_call_function_single() would enable preemption before
> csd_lock_wait() to reduce the critical section. To allow callers of
> smp_call_function_any() to also benefit from this optimization, remove
> get_cpu()/put_cpu() from smp_call_function_any().
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>
> ---
> kernel/smp.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> index 0858553f3666..f572716c3c7d 100644
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -772,13 +772,18 @@ int smp_call_function_any(const struct cpumask *mask,
> unsigned int cpu;
> int ret;
>
> + /*
> + * Prevent migration to another CPU after selecting the current CPU
> + * as the target.
> + */
> + guard(migrate)();
> +
> /* Try for same CPU (cheapest) */
> - cpu = get_cpu();
> + cpu = smp_processor_id();
> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask))
> cpu = sched_numa_find_nth_cpu(mask, 0, cpu_to_node(cpu));
>
> ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait);
> - put_cpu();
> return ret;
Urgh, that's horrible.
Basically what you want is something like so:
bool enable = true;
unsigned int cpu;
int ret;
preempt_disable();
cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask)) {
cpu = sched_numa_find_nth_cpu(mask, 0, cpu_to_node(cpu))
enable = false;
preempt_enable();
}
ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, wait);
if (enable)
preempt_enable();
return ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists