[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1fee1990-f525-4559-b121-46fd1e1c9fef@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 11:55:53 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Roger Shimizu <rosh@...ian.org>
Cc: Hongyang Zhao <hongyang.zhao@...ndersoft.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: lt9611: Support single Port
B input
On 06/02/2026 10:49, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 11:08 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/02/2026 21:31, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 5:07 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 07:15:45PM +0800, Hongyang Zhao wrote:
>>>>> The LT9611 has two DSI input ports (Port A and Port B). Update the
>>>>> binding to clearly document the port mapping and allow using Port B
>>>>> alone when DSI is physically connected to Port B only.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes:
>>>>> - Clarify port@0 corresponds to DSI Port A input
>>>>> - Clarify port@1 corresponds to DSI Port B input
>>>>> - Change port requirement from mandatory port@0 to anyOf port@...ort@1,
>>>>> allowing either port to be used independently
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hongyang Zhao <hongyang.zhao@...ndersoft.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Roger Shimizu <rosh@...ian.org>
>>>>
>>>> Where did this review happen? V1 had this tag, but the patch was
>>>> completely different, which means you were supposed to drop the tag.
>>>> Please perform review in public.
>>>
>>> FYI. v2 was updated per review feedback, which is public:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/7d9041a3-9d2b-469a-9fa7-89d53bbd2a1f@linaro.org/
>>
>> Link above is not from Roger, so again - where did the review leading to
>> above tag happen?
>
> Per feedback of v1, v2 was quite different than v1.
> For v2, it's close to initial review, because it looks like a new patch.
Where was the review of v2 given?
The patch is entirely different. I already said it. I also said what is
expected in such case. It is also documented:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists