[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEQ9gE=L3gsnyMtbVDbvHo-jhTSPw-8DJ7L2n9c=SKc6jOAHrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 21:22:08 -0800
From: Roger Shimizu <rosh@...ian.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Hongyang Zhao <hongyang.zhao@...ndersoft.com>, Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: lt9611: Support single Port
B input
On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 2:56 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 06/02/2026 10:49, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 11:08 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 05/02/2026 21:31, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 5:07 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 07:15:45PM +0800, Hongyang Zhao wrote:
> >>>>> The LT9611 has two DSI input ports (Port A and Port B). Update the
> >>>>> binding to clearly document the port mapping and allow using Port B
> >>>>> alone when DSI is physically connected to Port B only.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Changes:
> >>>>> - Clarify port@0 corresponds to DSI Port A input
> >>>>> - Clarify port@1 corresponds to DSI Port B input
> >>>>> - Change port requirement from mandatory port@0 to anyOf port@...ort@1,
> >>>>> allowing either port to be used independently
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Hongyang Zhao <hongyang.zhao@...ndersoft.com>
> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Roger Shimizu <rosh@...ian.org>
> >>>>
> >>>> Where did this review happen? V1 had this tag, but the patch was
> >>>> completely different, which means you were supposed to drop the tag.
> >>>> Please perform review in public.
> >>>
> >>> FYI. v2 was updated per review feedback, which is public:
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/7d9041a3-9d2b-469a-9fa7-89d53bbd2a1f@linaro.org/
> >>
> >> Link above is not from Roger, so again - where did the review leading to
> >> above tag happen?
> >
> > Per feedback of v1, v2 was quite different than v1.
> > For v2, it's close to initial review, because it looks like a new patch.
>
> Where was the review of v2 given?
>
> The patch is entirely different. I already said it. I also said what is
> expected in such case. It is also documented:
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
Thanks for the guide!
Yes, v2 was reviewed in private. I'll inform Hongyang to remove the
tag when he sends the next series.
-Roger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists