[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7889e13e-fd81-42aa-873c-92de641e1979@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 22:06:57 +0530
From: Nihal Kumar Gupta <quic_nihalkum@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
<robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
<hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>, <loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com>,
<rfoss@...nel.org>, <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org>
CC: <quic_svankada@...cinc.com>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ravi Shankar <quic_rshankar@...cinc.com>,
Vishal Verma <quic_vishverm@...cinc.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy
<vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio
<konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco-evk-camera: Add DT
overlay
On 06-02-2026 22:09, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Nihal Kumar Gupta <quic_nihalkum@...cinc.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Ravi Shankar <quic_rshankar@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Shankar <quic_rshankar@...cinc.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Vishal Verma <quic_vishverm@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <quic_vishverm@...cinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vikram Sharma <quic_vikramsa@...cinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 4 ++
>> .../dts/qcom/monaco-evk-camera-imx577.dtso | 66 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
>
> So many people developed it, three people reviewed it, patch is at v9 and...
>
> still was not build-tested by the author. At this point this is big
> surprise.
>
> NAK
Krzysztof, Thanks for your review.
All patches posted here were build‑tested and verified by the author. On the current master tip, I am seeing an unrelated issue where RB4 fails to boot due to a rootfs mount error.
>From next time, I’ll include the exact SHA on which the patches were validated.
Rootfs mount error log snippet:
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
[Firmware Bug]: Unable to handle paging request in EFI runtime service
[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0) ]
--
Regards,
Nihal Kumar Gupta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists