[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<MN2PR12MB403135B2284FF07BE080B527E765A@MN2PR12MB4031.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 07:20:13 +0000
From: "Chen, Dirk" <Dirk.Chen@....com>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ARM: dts: aspeed: anacapa: Add retimer EEPROMs
[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]
> This description seems surprising.
> Does the change reflect the hardware or not? What's the significance of the consistency comment if so?
> Andrew
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the review.
Yes, the change reflects the actual hardware. The Anacapa board has two EEPROMs on i2c0 and i2c1 for retimer configuration.
The mention of the Harma platform was intended to explain why I chose the "atmel,24c2048" compatible string
(as it was previously accepted for similar hardware in that platform), but I can see how that caused confusion.
I will send a v2 with a clearer description.
Best regards,
Dirk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists