[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56254198-c45d-427b-bcfb-fa9c60f11e71@vaisala.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 09:24:09 +0200
From: Tomas Melin <tomas.melin@...sala.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] iio: adc: ad9467: check for backend capabilities
Hi,
On 05/02/2026 18:34, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 12:24:11PM +0000, Tomas Melin wrote:
>> Add capability checks for operation with backends that do not necessarily
>> support full set of features, but are otherwise compatible with the device.
>> This ensures a fully functional device, but with limited capabilities.
>
> ...
>
>> + if (iio_backend_has_caps(st->back, IIO_BACKEND_CAP_BUFFER)) {
>> + ret = devm_iio_backend_request_buffer(&spi->dev, st->back,
>> + indio_dev);
>
> With
>
> struct device *dev = &spi->dev;
>
> at the top, this one becomes exactly a 80 character line.
> And in general it will help cleaning up the rest afterwards.
Given it seems it would still be 81 characters long I would like to
leave this change as it also creates a bit of noise.
Thanks,
Tomas
>
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists