[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYnzd55yYK5xRSpr@debian-BULLSEYE-live-builder-AMD64>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 11:47:19 -0300
From: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jic23@...nel.org,
michael.hennerich@...log.com, nuno.sa@...log.com,
eblanc@...libre.com, dlechner@...libre.com, andy@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/8] iio: adc: ad4030: Add support for ADAQ4216 and
ADAQ4224
On 02/08, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 04:02:19PM -0300, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> > ADAQ4216 and ADAQ4224 are similar to AD4030, but feature a PGA circuitry
> > that scales the analog input signal prior to it reaching the ADC. The PGA
> > is controlled through a pair of pins (A0 and A1) whose state define the
> > gain that is applied to the input signal.
> >
> > Add support for ADAQ4216 and ADAQ4224. Provide a list of PGA options
> > through the IIO device channel scale available interface and enable control
> > of the PGA through the channel scale interface.
>
> ...
>
> > +/*
> > + * Gains computed as fractions of 1000 so they can be expressed by integers.
> > + */
> > +static const int adaq4216_hw_gains_vpv[] = {
> > + 1 * MILLI / 3, /* 333 */
> > + 5 * MILLI / 9, /* 555 */
> > + 20 * MILLI / 9, /* 2222 */
> > + 20 * MILLI / 3, /* 6666 */
>
> In case you would need a new version, or Jonathan is okay to tweak, I think
> it's better to use float in the comments. The above comment explains the
> MILL multiplier for the values.
>
> 1 * MILLI / 3, /* 0.333 */
> 5 * MILLI / 9, /* 0.555 */
> 20 * MILLI / 9, /* 0.2222 */
> 20 * MILLI / 3, /* 0.6666 */
>
> > +};
>
> Btw, if this true (if I am not mistaken in the gain values), the question is
> why 0.2222 is much higher than 0.555.
I guess it has to do with how the PGA is set up, but I don't really know.
Those fractions are specified in the data sheet [1] and test results have shown
those are correct. I can't explain why we have those specific gain values, though.
[1]: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/adaq4216.pdf#unique_2_Connect_42_T1
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists