lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260210200407.GQ2995752@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:04:07 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, broonie@...nel.org,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Zide Chen <zide.chen@...el.com>,
	Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@...el.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...el.com>, Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@...el.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v6 12/22] perf: Add sampling support for SIMD registers

On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 03:20:37PM +0800, Dapeng Mi wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index d487c55a4f3e..5742126f50cc 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -7761,6 +7761,50 @@ perf_output_sample_regs(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void
> +perf_output_sample_simd_regs(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
> +			     struct perf_event *event,
> +			     struct pt_regs *regs,
> +			     u64 mask, u32 pred_mask)
> +{
> +	u16 pred_qwords = event->attr.sample_simd_pred_reg_qwords;
> +	u16 vec_qwords = event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords;
> +	u16 nr_vectors;
> +	u16 nr_pred;
> +	int bit;
> +	u64 val;
> +	u16 i;
> +
> +	nr_vectors = hweight64(mask);
> +	nr_pred = hweight32(pred_mask);
> +
> +	perf_output_put(handle, nr_vectors);
> +	perf_output_put(handle, vec_qwords);
> +	perf_output_put(handle, nr_pred);
> +	perf_output_put(handle, pred_qwords);
> +
> +	if (nr_vectors) {
> +		for (bit = 0; bit < sizeof(mask) * BITS_PER_BYTE; bit++) {
> +			if (!(BIT_ULL(bit) & mask))
> +				continue;
> +			for (i = 0; i < vec_qwords; i++) {
> +				val = perf_simd_reg_value(regs, bit, i, false);
> +				perf_output_put(handle, val);
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +	if (nr_pred) {
> +		for (bit = 0; bit < sizeof(pred_mask) * BITS_PER_BYTE; bit++) {
> +			if (!(BIT(bit) & pred_mask))
> +				continue;
> +			for (i = 0; i < pred_qwords; i++) {
> +				val = perf_simd_reg_value(regs, bit, i, true);
> +				perf_output_put(handle, val);
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +}

Yeah, that works, but it does make me sad. The existing
perf_output_sample_regs() has yet another solution.

Wondering how hard it could possibly be to write a for_each_set_bit()
variant that works on a given word (instead of an array), I did the
below.

It works (at least, the assembly looks about right); but I'm not sure
its all I had hoped for either :-(

---
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -7754,18 +7754,27 @@ void __weak perf_get_regs_user(struct pe
 	regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
 }
 
+/* Until GCC-14+/clang-19+, which have __builtin_ctzg() */
+#define __ctzg(val, def) \
+	(val) ? _Generic((val), \
+			 unsigned int: __builtin_ctz(val), \
+			 unsigned long: __builtin_ctzl(val), \
+			 unsigned long long: __builtin_ctzll(val)) : (def)
+
+#define __next_bit(val, bit) \
+	({ auto __v = (val); \
+	   __v &= GENMASK(sizeof(__v) * BITS_PER_BYTE - 1, bit); \
+	   __ctzg(__v, -1); })
+
+#define word_for_each_set_bit(bit, val) \
+	for (int bit = 0; bit = __next_bit(val, bit), bit >= 0; bit++)
+
 static void
 perf_output_sample_regs(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 			struct pt_regs *regs, u64 mask)
 {
-	int bit;
-	DECLARE_BITMAP(_mask, 64);
-
-	bitmap_from_u64(_mask, mask);
-	for_each_set_bit(bit, _mask, sizeof(mask) * BITS_PER_BYTE) {
-		u64 val;
-
-		val = perf_reg_value(regs, bit);
+	word_for_each_set_bit(bit, mask) {
+		u64 val = perf_reg_value(regs, bit);
 		perf_output_put(handle, val);
 	}
 }
@@ -7778,14 +7787,8 @@ perf_output_sample_simd_regs(struct perf
 {
 	u16 pred_qwords = event->attr.sample_simd_pred_reg_qwords;
 	u16 vec_qwords = event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords;
-	u16 nr_vectors;
-	u16 nr_pred;
-	int bit;
-	u64 val;
-	u16 i;
-
-	nr_vectors = hweight64(mask);
-	nr_pred = hweight32(pred_mask);
+	u16 nr_vectors = hweight64(mask);
+	u16 nr_pred = hweight32(pred_mask);
 
 	perf_output_put(handle, nr_vectors);
 	perf_output_put(handle, vec_qwords);
@@ -7793,21 +7796,17 @@ perf_output_sample_simd_regs(struct perf
 	perf_output_put(handle, pred_qwords);
 
 	if (nr_vectors) {
-		for (bit = 0; bit < sizeof(mask) * BITS_PER_BYTE; bit++) {
-			if (!(BIT_ULL(bit) & mask))
-				continue;
-			for (i = 0; i < vec_qwords; i++) {
-				val = perf_simd_reg_value(regs, bit, i, false);
+		word_for_each_set_bit(bit, mask) {
+			for (int i = 0; i < vec_qwords; i++) {
+				u64 val = perf_simd_reg_value(regs, bit, i, false);
 				perf_output_put(handle, val);
 			}
 		}
 	}
 	if (nr_pred) {
-		for (bit = 0; bit < sizeof(pred_mask) * BITS_PER_BYTE; bit++) {
-			if (!(BIT(bit) & pred_mask))
-				continue;
-			for (i = 0; i < pred_qwords; i++) {
-				val = perf_simd_reg_value(regs, bit, i, true);
+		word_for_each_set_bit(bit, pred_mask) {
+			for (int i = 0; i < pred_qwords; i++) {
+				u64 val = perf_simd_reg_value(regs, bit, i, true);
 				perf_output_put(handle, val);
 			}
 		}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ