[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260209192746.70529899@fedora>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 19:27:46 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux trace kernel
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] tracing: Move d_max_latency out of CONFIG_FSNOTIFY
protection
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
The tracing_max_latency shouldn't be limited if CONFIG_FSNOTIFY is defined
or not and it was moved out of that protection to be always available with
CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE. All was moved out except the dentry descriptor
for it (d_max_latency) and it failed to build on some configs.
Move that out of the CONFIG_FSNOTIFY protection too.
Fixes: ba73713da50e ("tracing: Clean up use of trace_create_maxlat_file()")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602092133.fTdojd95-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
index 31fb137e1c66..c08edaa7d179 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
@@ -346,8 +346,8 @@ struct trace_array {
spinlock_t snapshot_trigger_lock;
unsigned int snapshot;
unsigned long max_latency;
-#ifdef CONFIG_FSNOTIFY
struct dentry *d_max_latency;
+#ifdef CONFIG_FSNOTIFY
struct work_struct fsnotify_work;
struct irq_work fsnotify_irqwork;
#endif
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists