[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d2ccabb1-e1de-4767-a7b0-9d72982e52af@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2026 16:27:47 -0800
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>, "Drew
Fustini" <fustini@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Dave Martin
<Dave.Martin@....com>, Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>
CC: <corbet@....net>, <tglx@...nel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
<vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, <bsegall@...gle.com>, <mgorman@...e.de>,
<vschneid@...hat.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>, <pmladek@...e.com>,
<feng.tang@...ux.alibaba.com>, <kees@...nel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<fvdl@...gle.com>, <lirongqing@...du.com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<seanjc@...gle.com>, <xin@...or.com>, <manali.shukla@....com>,
<dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>, <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
<mario.limonciello@....com>, <naveen@...nel.org>,
<elena.reshetova@...el.com>, <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <peternewman@...gle.com>, <eranian@...gle.com>,
<gautham.shenoy@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] x86,fs/resctrl: Support for Global Bandwidth
Enforcement and Priviledge Level Zero Association
Adding Ben
On 2/3/26 11:58 AM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 03:12:38PM -0600, Babu Moger wrote:
>> Privilege Level Zero Association (PLZA)
>>
>> Privilege Level Zero Association (PLZA) allows the hardware to
>> automatically associate execution in Privilege Level Zero (CPL=0) with a
>> specific COS (Class of Service) and/or RMID (Resource Monitoring
>> Identifier). The QoS feature set already has a mechanism to associate
>> execution on each logical processor with an RMID or COS. PLZA allows the
>> system to override this per-thread association for a thread that is
>> executing with CPL=0.
>
> Adding Drew, and prodding Dave & James, for this discussion.
>
> At LPC it was stated that both ARM and RISC-V already have support
> to run kernel code with different quality of service parameters from
> user code.
>
> I'm thinking that Babu's implementation for resctrl may be over
> engineered. Specifically the part that allows users to put some
> tasks into the PLZA group, while leaving others in a mode where
> kernel code runs with same QoS parameters as user code.
>
> That comes at a cost of complexity, and performance in the context
> switch code.
>
> But maybe I'm missing some practical case where users want that
> behaviour.
>
> -Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists