[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260211094218.GA504514@shredder>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 11:42:18 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To: Linus Lüssing <linus.luessing@...3.blue>
Cc: bridge@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/14] net: bridge: mcast: track active
state, adding tests
On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 10:06:58PM +0100, Linus Lüssing wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 08, 2026 at 06:00:46PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> [...]
> > > +test_inactive_other_querier_norespdelay()
> > > +{
> > > + RET=0
> > > +
> > > + test_active_setup_bridge "1" "2" "3" "4" "5" "6"
> > > + test_active_setup_config "1" "2" "3" ""
> > > + #test_active_setup_wait
> >
> > Why the comment? There are more instances below
>
> The intention was just to highlight what was skipped in comparison
> to the according test_{vlan,}_active_*_querier() variants.
>
> Do you think I should remove these lines? Or add a brief
> clarification, something like "# skipped: test_active_setup_wait"?
OK, I see. A brief clarification would be good. I initially thought that
these are leftovers that you forgot to remove before submitting.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists