[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17776.25546.260105.848354@robur.slu.se>
Date:	Fri, 1 Dec 2006 18:18:02 +0100
From:	Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se>
To:	"Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	"Robert Olsson" <Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se>,
	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, greearb@...delatech.com,
	pavol.gono@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pktgen
Alexey Dobriyan writes:
 > 
 > Confused now. Is my "t->control &= ~(T_TERMINATE);" fix deprecated by
 > completions?
 
 It's not needed with completion patch as this does the job a bit more
 mainstream. The T_TERMINATE seems to work well I've tested on machine
 with CPU:s. Only once I noticed that only 2 of 4 threads got started 
 but it could be something else...
 And the race is hardly seen with any real use of pktgen.. .Let's hear
 what others... and completions was out-of-date.
 Cheers.
					--ro
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists