[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17776.25546.260105.848354@robur.slu.se>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 18:18:02 +0100
From: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se>
To: "Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: "Robert Olsson" <Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se>,
"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, greearb@...delatech.com,
pavol.gono@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pktgen
Alexey Dobriyan writes:
>
> Confused now. Is my "t->control &= ~(T_TERMINATE);" fix deprecated by
> completions?
It's not needed with completion patch as this does the job a bit more
mainstream. The T_TERMINATE seems to work well I've tested on machine
with CPU:s. Only once I noticed that only 2 of 4 threads got started
but it could be something else...
And the race is hardly seen with any real use of pktgen.. .Let's hear
what others... and completions was out-of-date.
Cheers.
--ro
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists