netdev - Re: [RFC][GENETLINK] move command capabilities to flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1165254484.3643.29.camel@localhost>
Date:	Mon, 04 Dec 2006 12:48:04 -0500
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][GENETLINK] move command capabilities  to flags

On Mon, 2006-04-12 at 17:31 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> * jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> 2006-12-04 08:01
> > The savings bytes is one aspect; the other is the cleanliness.
> > transfering a boolean in that many bits is a little of overkill.
> > I think it is better to fix it now than later.
> > I know you mentioned libnl uses it. But that is something you can change
> > on your side. I dont know of any other app that uses it. 
> 
> Right but if some distro is based on exactly 2.6.19 the specific libnl
> parts won't work at all for a long time.
> 

We can resolve that by uping the version for the controller.
User will use that a signal.

> > > If you
> > > really want to do it, remove the obsoleted attribute types, I don't
> > > like dead bodies laying around :-)
> > 
> > I could resend the patch getting rid of those definitions. 
> 
> OK, I can live with it, I don't care for the breakage much.

cool - will send a patch later.

cheers,
jamal

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html