netdev - Re: [RFC][GENETLINK] move command capabilities to flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061204163115.GR8693@postel.suug.ch>
Date:	Mon, 4 Dec 2006 17:31:15 +0100
From:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][GENETLINK] move command capabilities  to flags

* jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> 2006-12-04 08:01
> The savings bytes is one aspect; the other is the cleanliness.
> transfering a boolean in that many bits is a little of overkill.
> I think it is better to fix it now than later.
> I know you mentioned libnl uses it. But that is something you can change
> on your side. I dont know of any other app that uses it. 

Right but if some distro is based on exactly 2.6.19 the specific libnl
parts won't work at all for a long time.

> > If you
> > really want to do it, remove the obsoleted attribute types, I don't
> > like dead bodies laying around :-)
> 
> I could resend the patch getting rid of those definitions. 

OK, I can live with it, I don't care for the breakage much.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html