lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1167046499.3281.1623.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Mon, 25 Dec 2006 12:34:59 +0100
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Robert Iakobashvili <coroberti@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network card IRQ balancing with Intel 5000 series chipsets

On Mon, 2006-12-25 at 13:26 +0200, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
> 
> > Am I understanding you correctly that you want to spread the load of the
> > networking IRQ roughly equally over 2 cpus (or cores or ..)?
> 
> Yes, 4 cores.
> 
> > If so, that is very very suboptimal, especially for networking (since
> > suddenly a lot of packet processing gets to deal with out of order
> > receives and cross-cpu reassembly).
> 
> Agree. Unfortunately, we have a flow of small RTP packets with heavy
> processing and both Rx and Tx component on a single network card.
> The application is not too much sensitive to the out of order, etc.
> Thus, there 3 cores are actually doing nothing, whereas the CPU0
> is overloaded, preventing system CPU scaling.

in principle the actual work should still be spread over the cores;
unless you do everything in kernel space that is..

> Agree, that providing CPU affinity for a network interrupt is a rather
> reasonable default.
> However, should a chipset manufacture take from us the very freedom of
> tuning, freedom of choice?

it can still be done using the TPR (Thread Priority Register) of the
APIC. It's just... not there in Linux (other OSes do use this).

-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ