[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e63f56c0612261151y7aa95954hb2a1d47ce130c38d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:51:31 +0200
From: "Robert Iakobashvili" <coroberti@...il.com>
To: hadi@...erus.ca
Cc: "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network card IRQ balancing with Intel 5000 series chipsets
On 12/26/06, jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> wrote:
>
> If you compile in PCI-E support you should have more control of the
> MSI-X, no? I would tie the MSI to a specific processor statically; my
> past experiences with any form of interupt balancing with network loads
> has been horrible.
>
> cheers,
> jamal
Thanks for the direction.
In meanwhile I have removed all userland processes from CPU0,
that handles network card interrupts and all packet-processing (kernel-space).
Still, it should be some way of CPU-scaling; even for the case of the
only network
card.
> > >
> > > it can still be done using the TPR (Thread Priority Register) of the
> > > APIC. It's just... not there in Linux (other OSes do use this).
> >
> > Have you any specific pointers for doing it (beyond Internet search)?
> > Your input would be very much appreciated.
--
Sincerely,
Robert Iakobashvili,
coroberti %x40 gmail %x2e com
...................................................................
Navigare necesse est, vivere non est necesse
...................................................................
http://sourceforge.net/projects/curl-loader
A powerful open-source HTTP/S, FTP/S traffic
generating, loading and testing tool.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists