netdev - Re: Network card IRQ balancing with Intel 5000 series chipsets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1167158658.3746.12.camel@localhost>
Date:	Tue, 26 Dec 2006 13:44:18 -0500
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Robert Iakobashvili <coroberti@...il.com>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network card IRQ balancing with Intel 5000 series chipsets


If you compile in PCI-E support you should have more control of the
MSI-X, no? I would tie the MSI to a specific processor statically; my
past experiences with any form of interupt balancing with network loads
has been horrible.

cheers,
jamal

On Mon, 2006-25-12 at 14:54 +0200, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
> Arjan,
> 
> On 12/25/06, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-12-25 at 13:26 +0200, Robert Iakobashvili wrote:
> > >
> >
> > it can still be done using the TPR (Thread Priority Register) of the
> > APIC. It's just... not there in Linux (other OSes do use this).
> 
> Interesting.
> Have you any specific pointers for doing it (beyond Internet search)?
> Your input would be very much appreciated.
> Thank you.
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html