netdev - RE: one vs. two drivers for an iWARP-capable Ethernet NIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <78C9135A3D2ECE4B8162EBDCE82CAD77010FB436@nekter>
Date:	Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:31:13 -0500
From:	"Leonid Grossman" <Leonid.Grossman@...erion.com>
To:	"Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@...ox.com>, <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <openib-general@...nib.org>
Subject: RE: one vs. two drivers for an iWARP-capable Ethernet NIC

Re-sending as a plain text to reach netdev.
Sorry for the extra traffic, please ignore the earlier html version of
this e-mail...
------------------------------------------------------------

Jeff/Roland/all,
What is the preferred submission driver model for an iWARP-capable
Ethernet NIC - two separate drivers (Ethernet and OpenFabrics) that
interact with each other, or a single driver that supports both
OpenFabrics and Ethernet interfaces?

For our hardware we can go either way, although in case of separate
drivers the interface between the two would get somewhat artificial...

	Thanks, Leonid

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html