netdev - Re: Generic PHY lib vs. locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1167337330.23340.64.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:22:10 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>
Cc:	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Generic PHY lib vs. locking

> Great!  At last glance, only gianfar, fs_enet, and au1000_eth.  There  
> are one or two others that haven't gone in, yet.  My hope is that  
> your changes will not require any changes to the drivers, but I'll  
> leave that to your discretion.

Unfortunately, it will probably have an impact on them. I'll have a
look.

Ben.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html