[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070104102707.GA7662@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 21:27:07 +1100
From: Herbert Xu <herbert.xu@...hat.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
Cc: David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>, greearb@...delatech.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! (2.6.18.2 plus hacks)
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 09:50:14AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> Could you explain? I can see some inet_rtm_newaddr
> interrupted. For me it could be e.g.:
>
> after
> vconfig add eth0 9
>
> ip addr add dev eth0.9 ...
Whether eth0.9 is up or not does not affect this at all. The spin
locks are initialised (and used) when the first IPv4 address is added,
not when the device comes up.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists