[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45A54708.30307@web.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:05:28 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...e.cz>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ivo Van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] d80211: don't symlink empty default keys
Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:33:34 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> This gets rid of annoying
>>
>> wlan0: cannot create symlink to default key
>>
>> in my syslog with latest rt2x00. The patch takes care that in case of
>> (key/old_key == NULL && set_tx_key) the existing default key symlink is
>> removed correctly. Moreover, it tests for key!=NULL before trying to register
>> a new default link.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
>>
>> ---
>> ieee80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: rt2x00/ieee80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- rt2x00.orig/ieee80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c
>> +++ rt2x00/ieee80211/ieee80211_ioctl.c
>> @@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ static int ieee80211_set_encryption(stru
>> }
>> kfree(keyconf);
>>
>> - if (key && sdata->default_key == key) {
>> + if (set_tx_key || (key && sdata->default_key == key)) {
>> ieee80211_key_sysfs_remove_default(sdata);
>
> This is not correct when set_tx_key is set and sdata->default_key is
> NULL.
Hmm, is this required? Will sysfs_remove_link panic on non-existent
nodes? If yes or if it's considered better style, are you OK with
catching NULL in ieee80211_key_sysfs_remove_default and refactoring the
existing tests along this way?
Jan
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (251 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists