[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200701131509.26877.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:09:26 +0100
From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@....org>
Cc: bcm43xx-dev@...ts.berlios.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What is in bcm43xx-wireless-dev.git?
On Saturday 13 January 2007 08:45, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Quoting Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>:
>
> > > drivers/ssb/driver_mips/mips.c includes asm/time.h, which is missing on
> > > x86_64. It also refers to struct ssb_serial_ports, which is not defined
> > > anywhere.
> >
> > Yeah, CONFIG_SSB_MIPS should depend on the MIPS CPU.
> > Which kconfig option do you suggest to make a "depend" on?
>
> I try not to add artificial restrictions. The driver should depend on the
> components providing the necessary API.
Ehm, it is clearly not artificial. The MIPS core depends on the MIPS
platform. Logically and technically. You must not enable it on
non-MIPS platforms, as it's tied with the internals of the MIPS
arch dependent code.
The only logical way to solve the compile issues are to make a dependency
on the MIPS platform.
> > > drivers/ssb/driver_pci/pcicore.c refers to SSB_PCICORE_SBTOPCI1_CFG1
> > > that is not defined anywhere in the kernel.
> >
> > Yeah, could be a typo. I'll have a look at it.
>
> I only found it because the driver didn't depend on MIPS. See what I mean?
>
> This only manifests if CONFIG_SSB_PCICORE_HOSTMODE is defined, and it is only
> selected by CONFIG_SSB_DRIVER_MIPS.
HOSTMODE is not really tested, yet.
And HOSTMODE is _also_ very closely tied to the MIPS platform. So
it must depend on it, too (probably indirectly through the MIPS core driver).
To be honest, I did not even compiletest the HOSTMODE code, as I don't
even have a device for it. But I am going to fix that before pushing stuff
upstream.
> > Hm, not sure why this oopses. It works on PPC (can transmit data and so on).
>
> My PPC machine is a venerable Blue&White G3, so it won't take PCIe.
I looked more closely at it, but I really can't see why it oopses.
Any idea what's happening there?
> > Does it work with linville's tree (in DMA mode)?
>
> Yes, it does. I couldn't connect to the AP, but it's a different story. I may
> be doing things wrong. At least I can scan and I see the APs around.
Well, ok. So it should work in my tree, too, once we fixed the DMA oops.
--
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists