[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45B0B744.7070800@trash.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:19:16 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Russell Stuart <russell-tcatm@...art.id.au>
CC: hadi@...erus.ca, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL
(kernel)
Russell Stuart wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 12:37 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>>>Or are you proposing tc behave differently on different
>>>kernel versions. (I have no problem with that, but
>>>isn't it officially frowned upon?)
>>
>>Yes. There is no way you can make this work on old kernels,
>>nobody expects that. The important part is that everything
>>continues to work as before and that both old and new iproute
>>binaries work properly on both old and new kernels (new
>>iproute on old kernels without STABs obviously).
>
>
> I thought that some degree of compatibility was
> expected. At the very least the newest version
> of "tc" must work on _any_ kernel as least as
> well as the version it replaces did.
>
> I also though newer kernels should work older
> version of iproute2, albeit without the features
> added in the newer versions.
>
> Are you saying this is not so?
No, thats exactly what I'm saying.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists