netdev - Re: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL (kernel)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:19:16 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Russell Stuart <russell-tcatm@...art.id.au>
CC:	hadi@...erus.ca, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST	1/2]	NET:	Accurate	packet	scheduling	for	ATM/ADSL
 (kernel)

Russell Stuart wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 12:37 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>>>Or are you proposing tc behave differently on different
>>>kernel versions.  (I have no problem with that, but
>>>isn't it officially frowned upon?)
>>
>>Yes. There is no way you can make this work on old kernels,
>>nobody expects that. The important part is that everything
>>continues to work as before and that both old and new iproute
>>binaries work properly on both old and new kernels (new
>>iproute on old kernels without STABs obviously).
> 
> 
> I thought that some degree of compatibility was 
> expected.  At the very least the newest version 
> of "tc" must work on _any_ kernel as least as 
> well as the version it replaces did.
> 
> I also though newer kernels should work older
> version of iproute2, albeit without the features
> added in the newer versions.
> 
> Are you saying this is not so?

No, thats exactly what I'm saying.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html