lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 13:25:17 +1000 From: Russell Stuart <russell-tcatm@...art.id.au> To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> Cc: hadi@...erus.ca, netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] NET: Accurate packet scheduling for ATM/ADSL (kernel) On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 13:19 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Russell Stuart wrote: > > I thought that some degree of compatibility was > > expected. At the very least the newest version > > of "tc" must work on _any_ kernel as least as > > well as the version it replaces did. > > > > I also though newer kernels should work older > > version of iproute2, albeit without the features > > added in the newer versions. > > > > Are you saying this is not so? > > No, thats exactly what I'm saying. I don't understand - too many negates here without parens. Are you saying: a. Backward / Forward compatibility between the kernel and its user space tools isn't an issue, or b. There is no compatibility problem. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists