lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:54:53 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> cc: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: Possible ways of dealing with OOM conditions. On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > Cache misses for small packet flow due to the fact, that the same data > > is allocated and freed and accessed on different CPUs will become an > > issue soon, not right now, since two-four core CPUs are not yet to be > > very popular and price for the cache miss is not _that_ high. > > SGI does networking too, right? Sslab deals with those issues the right way. We have per processor queues that attempt to keep the cache hot state. A special shared queue exists between neighboring processors to facilitate exchange of objects between then. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists