netdev - Re: [2.6 patch] NF_CONNTRACK_H323 must depend on (IPV6 || IPV6=n)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070128.160442.48527586.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:04:42 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bunk@...sta.de
Cc:	randy.dunlap@...cle.com, akpm@...l.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...ts.netfilter.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] NF_CONNTRACK_H323 must depend on (IPV6 || IPV6=n)

From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 01:00:11 +0100

> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:53:48PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > Adrian is this the correct way to constrain the selection between
> > "n" and "m" in this kind of situation?  I thought doing something
> > like "depends on IPV6" is sufficient to achieve that?
> 
> "depends on IPV6" would fix the bug - but it would also make 
> NF_CONNTRACK_H323 unavailable for all people without IPV6 support in 
> their kernel.

Yes, that is an issue.

I guess with some slightly ugly ifdefs we could support the
whole matrix of possibilities.  But perhaps that's undesirable
for another reason.

Patrick?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html