[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070206.104408.87339760.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:44:08 +0900 (JST)
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: nhorman@...driver.com, vladislav.yasevich@...com, sri@...ibm.com,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, pekkas@...core.fi, jmorris@...ei.org,
kaber@...eworks.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Implement RFC 4429 Optimistic Duplicate Address
Detection
In article <20070205.173258.102576664.davem@...emloft.net> (at Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:32:58 -0800 (PST)), David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> says:
> From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:24:05 +0900 (JST)
>
> > > @@ -498,7 +500,8 @@ static void ndisc_send_na(struct net_device *dev, struct neighbour *neigh,
> > > msg->icmph.icmp6_unused = 0;
> > > msg->icmph.icmp6_router = router;
> > > msg->icmph.icmp6_solicited = solicited;
> > > - msg->icmph.icmp6_override = override;
> > > + msg->icmph.icmp6_override = override;
> > > +
> > >
> > > /* Set the target address. */
> > > ipv6_addr_copy(&msg->target, solicited_addr);
> >
> > Why do you "change" this?
>
> He edited it, but then reverted his change but in the
> process added proper tab characters :-) It is easy
> to miss things like this.
I know, you know. :-)
> This whole file has a lot of lines lacking proper tab
> characters.
Yes, I agree, but I think it is different issue, and
maybe, we should check and change other places as well,
in separate patch(es).
--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists