lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:44:13 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org> To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] div64_64 support On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:02:50 +0100 (MET) Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> wrote: > > On Feb 26 2007 13:28, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >> > >> ./arch/arm26/lib/udivdi3.c > >> ./arch/sh/lib/udivdi3.c > >> ./arch/sparc/lib/udivdi3.S > >> > >> should not this be consolidated too? > > > >Hmm. Those are the GCC internal versions, that are picked up but > >doing divide in place. Do we want to allow general 64 bit in kernel to > >be easily used? It could cause sloppy slow code, but it would look > >cleaner. > > Then our reviewers should catch it, and if not, the janitors will > (/me winks at R.P.J.Day and trivial@). > > >@@ -134,7 +112,7 @@ > > */ > > do { > > x1 = x; > >- x = (2 * x + (uint32_t) div64_64(a, x*x)) / 3; > >+ x = (2 * x + (u32) (a / x*x)) / 3; > > Eye see a bug. > > Previously there was div64_64(a, x*x) which is equivalent to > (a)/(x*x), or just: a/(x^2). But now you do a/x*x, which is > equivalent to a*x/x (in the domain of real numbers). Furthermore, > a/x*x is a-(a%x), which does not even remotely match a/(x^2). > > Please keep the math intact, thank you ;-) Been there, done that, don't want to repeat it... -- Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists