lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:02:50 +0100 (MET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <>
Subject: Re: [RFC] div64_64 support

On Feb 26 2007 13:28, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> ./arch/arm26/lib/udivdi3.c
>> ./arch/sh/lib/udivdi3.c
>> ./arch/sparc/lib/udivdi3.S
>> should not this be consolidated too?
>Hmm. Those are the GCC internal versions, that are picked up but
>doing divide in place. Do we want to allow general 64 bit in kernel to
>be easily used? It could cause sloppy slow code, but it would look

Then our reviewers should catch it, and if not, the janitors will
(/me winks at R.P.J.Day and trivial@).

>@@ -134,7 +112,7 @@
> 	 */
> 	do {
> 		x1 = x;
>-		x = (2 * x + (uint32_t) div64_64(a, x*x)) / 3;
>+		x = (2 * x + (u32) (a / x*x)) / 3;

Eye see a bug.

Previously there was div64_64(a, x*x) which is equivalent to
(a)/(x*x), or just: a/(x^2). But now you do a/x*x, which is
equivalent to a*x/x (in the domain of real numbers). Furthermore,
a/x*x is a-(a%x), which does not even remotely match a/(x^2).

Please keep the math intact, thank you ;-)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists