netdev - Re: [Bonding-devel] [PATCH 2/3] bonding: only receive ARPs for us

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:41:18 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] [PATCH 2/3] bonding: only receive ARPs for us

Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> 
>> Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>>> 	The ARP validation code only needs ARPs for the bonding device.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
>> I seem to have lost the context of this.  Did this get discussed, and 
>> need further revision?
> 
> 	The further discussion can be (loosely) paraphrased as:
> 
> Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>: "Hey, this no workee with IPv6."
> 
> Me: "True, but bonding no workee with IPv6 at all."
> 
> Andy: "Oh, ok.  Ack."
> 
> 	After which followed some preliminary yakkage about fixing up
> said non-workee IPv6 support.

thanks :)  I'll make sure the 3 patches go into #upstream-fixes


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html