[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25477.1174054742@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:19:02 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, herbert.xu@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arjan@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] AF_RXRPC: Add blkcipher accessors for using kernel data directly [try #2]
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> As do many things but the goal of the coding style is consistency and
> almost all other code doesn't have the static inline wasting an extra
> display line.
Actually it doesn't waste an extra display line. Either the static inline is
on a line of its own, or the first argument is on a line of its own. Either
way it uses up two lines - unless you want to split it up further and have
four lines as per Christoph's second suggestion (static inline / void /
funcname / 1st arg).
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists