[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1174375109.4895.22.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:18:29 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, chris@...lexsecurity.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, tgraf@...g.ch
Subject: Re: Oops in filter add
On Tue, 2007-20-03 at 07:58 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> jamal wrote:
> > The main idea is to avoid one BigLock for both ingress and egress;
> > Which was/is still useful in the compat mode where netfilter is used
> > instead.
>
>
> In that case is isn't even used.
>
Ok. It certainly used to matter in the old days.
> You would need to make qdisc_lock_tree() aware of the difference
> between ingress and egress.
If you have the cycles please go ahead - I really dont have much time
today (have to present in a few hours and havent even started).
I will most certainly look in 1-2 days; for now the queue_lock should
suffice;
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists