lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:26:42 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Zacco <zacco@...hu>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, baruch@...en.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: many sockets, slow sendto

Zacco a écrit :
> So, my worry is confirmed then. But how could that delay disappear when 
> splitting the sender and receiver on distinct hosts? Even in that case 
> the good socket must be found somehow.


When the receiver and sender are on the same machine, the sendto() pass the 
packet to loopback and enters the receiving side. With that many sockets, the 
time to go through all sockets maybe 100 us. So your sendto() seems to be 
slow, but the slow part is the receiver.

If you put two machines, the sender might send XX.XXX frames per second (full 
speed), but the receiver might handle 5% of them and drop 95%

This is all speculation, since you didnt gave us the exact setup you use.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists