netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/7] skge: use per-port phy locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46036A75.6030005@pobox.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Mar 2007 01:49:41 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] skge: use per-port phy locking

Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> Rather than a workqueue and a per-board mutex to control PHY,
> use a tasklet and spinlock. Tasklet is lower overhead and works
> just as well for this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>

Like we give a crap about overhead of PHY code.

This seems like the wrong direction to me, but let's see where this leads.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html